杂篇 -- 拂拭念头、造器与自洽：AI 时代属于每个人的秩序
前言
年少时偏爱慧能的“本来无一物，何处惹尘埃”，觉得辩才无碍、禅理更高。后来阅历渐长才体会到，纯粹的理想主义往往缺乏立足的土壤；身心终究与外物紧密勾连，神秀的“时时勤拂拭，莫使惹尘埃”反而更贴合真实的现实。
这恰如热力学第二定律的隐喻：孤立系统天然滑向无序与混沌，若想维系局部的秩序，就必须有外部能量的介入。甚至连麦克斯韦笔下那个试图通过甄别快慢分子、逆转熵增的“小妖”，现代物理学也早已给出了判定——它的观察、记录与遗忘，无一不以消耗能量和向外散发熵为代价。所谓“勤拂拭”，从不是一劳永逸的玄想，而是作为那个守门的生命本身，在漫长的耗散中清醒地为秩序支付代价。
然而，维持秩序的能耗一旦失控，门前的小妖迟早会力竭崩塌。
过去很长一段时间，我都觉得自己属于“有点小聪明，却极度懒惰”的人。读书时，我惊诧于老师能在电脑里将教案、试卷、学情分析和课表计划管理得井井有条；工作后，我也由衷佩服一些老派工程师，能把庞杂的工程资产乃至版本分支梳理得一丝不苟。而我往往只能粗粝地分几个大类，过去总把这归咎于自己的惰性，怪自己做不到“时时勤拂拭”。
直到最近重新审视才意识到，这其实是认知架构的阻抗不匹配。他们能做到，是因为其思维链条天然契合“树状目录”的层级编码方式；而我的思考是跳跃和发散的，脑海中浮现的是交织的高维特征与网状关联，根本无法被收敛进一条单向延伸的绝对路径里。
这种认知负荷的隐患，最近在我的几台电脑上迎来了集中爆发。
我写了一段脚本扫描全盘，结果令人窒息：单是其中一台设备上，散落的 Git 仓库就超过了两百个。如果真要去“时时拂拭”，就必须逐一走进这些目录。但对跳跃思维的人来说，每一个仓库都不是死寂的文件夹，而是一截凝固的思维切片——光是在路径间游走，频繁的上下文切换就会掀起风暴；任何细微的信息变动或权重起伏，都会瞬间勾连出一整张联想网络，激发出不可遏制的思触。
我的大脑额定功率根本支撑不住这种级别的缓存颠簸与中断风暴，强行整理，只会让心智在过度做功中自耗殆尽。而市面上常见的工具，无一例外都建立在层级索引的逻辑之上，它们非但帮不上忙，反而在催促我做更多徒劳的无用功。
既然问题出在处理器架构与数据组织的根本错配，解法就绝非靠意志力强行超频，而是重构底层的交互协议。
我停止了对“疏于整理”的徒劳自省，转而解剖自己的认知模型：我的大脑本质上是一个高维、网状的特征匹配系统，天然排斥树状结构的串行寻址。基于对这种痛点的挖掘，我为特征敏感型思维重新构想了一套管理工具：以特征多维投影替代层级路径，设立“上下文防火墙”来阻断不必要的思维激惹。它不再是一个催人干活的监工，而是一个替守门小妖分摊做功成本的外部协处理器。
读者诸君，这篇杂篇便由这个小工具的诞生产生，但若仅停留于代码与工程实现，便辜负了这场心智审视的初衷。在本篇中，我想同诸位探讨几个更深层的问题：
- 拂拭的本末：我们日常所执着的“整理”，究竟是在拂拭尘埃，还是在遮蔽心智？
- 三思与泛化：这种适合跳跃思维的解构方案，能否推广至文档、知识乃至普适的资产治理？
- AI时代的自知与赋能：在技术门槛逐步降低的当下，究竟什么才是构筑个人秩序的核心前提？
拂拭念头：从道德自省到认知确证
平心而论，世间大多数人面对秩序混乱时，第一反应往往是道德化评判。
在传统的教育与职场语境里，桌面整洁、文档井井有条被视为自律与成熟的象征；而杂乱、分类模糊则常常被贴上“懒惰”、“随性”、“缺乏条理”的标签。很长一段时间里，我也是这套评判标准的俘虏。每当看到自己凌乱的硬盘，内心总会浮现一种难以名状的内耗——怪自己做不到“时时拂拭”，怪自己的意志力无法战胜熵增。
然而，我在此次审视中得到的第一个明悟是：“勤拂拭”的第一步，不是去拂拭外物，而是拂拭自己的念头。
所谓念头上的尘埃，恰恰是“别人能做到的标准，我也必须削足适履地去适应”的执念。
当我真正停下来，以客观、冷酷的工程视角去解剖自己的心智时，我发现跳跃思维并非生理缺陷，而是另一种计算架构：
- 它的优势在于跨领域的敏锐直觉、高维特征的瞬间抓取、以及天马行空的灵感涌现；
- 它的物理代价，则是对强行分类与串行深搜的极高心理抗阻。
如果你是一台天然适合运行图数据库（Graph Database）或向量检索的神经计算单元，却非要通过意志力强行模拟传统的 B+ 树单向索引，那么每一次寻找文件的过程，都是在引发大规模的内部异常与缓存置换。
作者按： 就我个人体会而言，过去常自责的“拖延”与“懒惰”，其实往往是心智系统在遭遇严重认知阻抗时的自保机制。擦掉道德自责的尘埃，认清自己的认知长短板，才是明确真实需求的第一步。
格物与造器：平滑建构与空间跃迁
认清了自己的认知模型后，解法便水到渠成。既然我不适合逐层遍历物理目录，那为何要逼自己像图书管理员一样给文件编目？
我为自己构想并实现了本地工作台 igit（目前已在 GitHub 开源：leobert-lan/igit ）。在设计这套工具时，我没有采用任何市场上“教用户如何规范管理”的规训逻辑，而是完全围绕跳跃思维的特质，将其拆解为平滑过渡与空间运作的完整生命周期：
阶段一：从物理目录平滑建立空间
很多工具之所以推行困难，是因为它们在第一步就要求用户“脱胎换骨”——在接入之前，先得花上几天时间把全盘所有目录重新整理、分类归档。这对于跳跃思维的人而言，无异于在起跑线上就引爆了中断风暴。
因此，igit 的第一阶段追求的是零阻抗的平滑冷启动：
- 无感探测与全盘索引：直接自动探测电脑高频代码目录，不破坏原有的磁盘树状结构；
- 遇水搭桥，随手标定：在日常依然使用 cd work 等常规习惯漫游磁盘，但在偶遇某个仓库的当下，顺手敲击动词 group 或 tag。缺参时就地呼出编号菜单，按数字轻点即可完成业务归属或标签绑定；
- 噪音目录成片屏蔽：遇到庞杂陈旧的目录或第三方库，一行 hide 或 fold 直接在全盘扫描与视界中消音折叠。
不需要专门抽调整块精力搞一次脱胎换骨的“大扫除”，动态空间是在日常每一次顺带的“轻拂”中，自然生长出来的。
阶段二：动态空间的自如流转与原位行动
当业务分组（Group，\(N:1\)）与属性标签（Tag，\(N:M\)）随着日常流转逐步成型，工具便自然进入了第二阶段：
- 以多维语义投影替代层级路径： 在物理磁盘上，代码散落各处；但在认知视界中，通过一组自由的 Tag 与 Group，瞬间将全盘资产按当前念头拉平聚拢。想看核心业务就看核心业务，想找某个特定属性的原型就通过标签漏斗聚合。
- 空间即上下文，动词即意图：
一旦走进某个单仓节点，所有的后续操作默认就地生效。不再要求反复敲击冗长的路径，也不要求记忆繁琐的命令行参数。想提交就敲 commit，想看改动就敲 tig；缺参时由选项交互温柔承接，绝不抛出冰冷的语法错误。
- 上下文防火墙阻断激惹： 客观的 Git 提交与分支是底层事实，而开发者的主观治理结论永久沉淀。物理存在但被打上折叠或隐藏标记的仓库，绝不会跳出来激惹出无意义的杂念。
延伸价值：从被动检索到主动“引导念头”
在这个空间稳定运转后，我体会到了一个始料未及的收获：它不仅能被动承接我的跳跃思考，甚至反过来成为了我主动引导念头的思维脚手架。
人在极度专注或极度忙碌时，往往容易陷入单一路径的隧道视野；而当闲暇下来、想要开启一段新的思考时，面对空空的屏幕，往往又不知从何切入。
此时，我便可以在某一类特定的 Tag 下，拉出相关的项目切片。看着这些凝固着过去不同时期探索的同类节点，尝试去诱导自己：
- “在这一类领域中，我是不是还有未解决的疑问值得继续深挖？”
- “这几个同源但演化不同的模块，是否可以抽取共通的模型进行反思温故？”
它从最初单纯的“仓库索引器”，演变成了替我保存思维断点、并在需要时主动激活思绪的外部共鸣箱。
进入三思：资产管理的本质是“认知映射”
造器告一段落，进入“三思”阶段，我开始审视一个更宽广的命题：
这种适合跳跃思维的解构方案，仅仅适用于 Git 代码仓库吗？ 日常的文档管理、知识笔记、乃至更泛化的个人数字资产，是否同样在遭受层级结构的凌迟？
答案显然是肯定的。
读者诸君不妨审视一下自己的日常： 比如你在即时通讯软件中接收了一份带有保密条款的商业合作协议：
- 它是属于 /2026工作/法务合规/协议/？
- 还是属于 /某某客户项目/商务附件/？
- 亦或是属于 /财务审核/待结算流程/？
又比如，你在浏览器中下载了一篇关于分布式系统一致性协议的经典论文：
- 它是该存入 /技术调研/分布式系统/共识算法/？
- 还是存入 /学习资料/系统架构/经典论文/？
- 抑或是存入 /当前研发项目/参考资料/？
单亲继承的树状目录逼迫人在信息诞生的瞬间，就必须为其指定一个唯一的“终身籍贯”。但现实中，信息的属性从来都是多维的。跳跃思维之所以畏惧整理文档，正是因为在决策这个“归属地”时，大脑被迫预演未来的检索路径，耗尽了心智带宽。
在我看来，未来的泛化资产管理，必然会走向与这套哲学相通的道路：
- 存储物理位置的边缘化（Storage Decoupling）：无论文档落在哪个目录、甚至落在哪个设备，其物理路径都不再重要。
- 动态视图与语义投影（Dynamic Projection）：用户基于当下意图（项目、阶段、状态、关联人）实时定义过滤条件，文档在视图层动态聚合。
- 原位消费与低感知标定（In-situ Consumption）：消费与治理同时发生，在浏览、阅读的顺手之间完成维度标注，拒绝专门腾出大块精力去“大扫除”。
从“物理容器归类”跃迁至“认知意图投影”，这不是偷懒，而是将信息管理的范式，从贴合机器磁盘寻址，回调为贴合人类的思维流向。
AI 时代的反思：自知、本质洞察与造器门槛
写到这里，绕不开我们身处的这个剧烈变迁的技术周期。
放在五年前，一个有着独特认知习惯的人若想打造一套完全契合自己的全盘资产工作台，成本是极高的：你需要精通系统底层 API、熟悉终端交互、处理跨平台兼容与性能调优。对于非程序员群体，这无异于天方夜谭，大多数人只能在市面上提供的现成软件中削足适履。
但在 AI 快速演进的当下，实现技术的门槛正在被逐步拉低。一个即使不具备深厚工程背景的人，只要能将问题表述清晰，也能借助大语言模型搭建出满足特定需求的趁手工具。
然而，工具制造门槛的降低，并不自动等同于心智的解脱。
实现一个真正契合自身的工具，有着极其严苛的前提。这个前提绝不是 Prompt 该怎么写，而是：
- 是否能够在漫长的外部喧嚣与评判标准中，时时拂拭内心，洞悉自己最真实的认知特质、思维边界与刚性需求？
- 是否具备穿透表象、认清其背后本质问题（例如数学机理、信息论规律、数据结构与算法本质）的抽象能力？
- 是否有勇气跳出世俗既定的工具范式，为自己独立定义一套契合心性的交互模型与生活秩序？
在 AI 时代，对于那些边界明确、设计清晰、规格标准化的功能单元与样板代码，其编写正急剧退化为可由机器完成的体力劳动；但若缺乏清晰的架构定义与边界划分，全自动编写复杂系统目前依然是不可触及的空想。
更进一步地说，如果缺乏穿透表象认清本质的能力，即便手握 AI，人们往往也只能在表层打转，制造出又一个平庸的玩具；如果未曾拂拭内心的执念，用 AI 搓出来的也不过是另一个稍微复杂一点的“层级目录监工”，继续用大众工业化标准在精神上鞭笞自己。
这是 AI 令人心驰神往的一面：它大幅降低了从“构想”到“器物”的实现阻力，让人能够打破现成软件的樊笼，将自己独特的认知范式具象化为现实。
结语：人人皆有龙之德
回到开篇处慧能与神秀的禅偈。
我们终于明白，所谓“时时勤拂拭”，从来不是为了迎合世俗的整洁标准去徒劳地受苦，而是以清醒的心智，时刻照看自己的思维与情绪，拂去附着在认知表层的偏见与内耗。
先认识自己，而后格物致知；穿透事物之本质，方能借器修身。
在儒家易学中，有一种极宏阔的宇宙观与人文关怀——《易经·乾卦》所阐发的“群龙无首，吉”，所期盼的正是**“人人如龙”**的天地气象。那绝非要全天下的人都磨灭个性、去争抢同一座山峰的顶巅，而是每个人都能明心见性、正位凝命，将自身的天赋潜能舒展至极致；每个人都能依据自身的节律自强不息，自立秩序，不被任何单一的标准所驯化。
时代正在将降低门槛的技术刻刀交到每个人手中。你不必成为任何现成工具的奴隶，也不必强迫自己的跳跃灵感去迁就任何僵化的层级、或者世俗既定的思维模具。
拂去心中的尘埃，认清真实的自己，在顺应心智的做功中建立属于自己的秩序。在这条自渡的路上，人人皆有其光芒，人人皆可如龙。
相关拙作：推倒樊笼 -- 设计能力 / 杂篇（六）
本文由 AI图鉴自动抓取并翻译，版权归原作者所有；如需查看原文请点下方链接。
Scripts -- Wandering Minds, Machines and Concordance: The AI Age is the order of everyone.
Foreword
When they were young, they preferred "none was there, nowhere was there dust" and felt that the argument was clear and better. Later, it became clear that pure idealism often lacked the ground; that the body and the body eventually became closely connected to the outside world, and that the show's “time and time to do nothing” was more in tune with the real reality.
This is exactly the metaphor of the second law of thermodynamics: the system of isolation is naturally sliding towards disorder and confusion, and if local order is to be maintained, external energy must be involved. Even Maxwell's little demon, who tried to reverse the growth of entropy by screening slow molecules, has been judged by modern physics. Its observations, records and oblivion are all at the cost of consuming energy and spreading entropy out. The so-called “scrambling” has never been a once-in-a-lifetime wish, but, as the doorkeeper's life itself, has paid the price for order in the long run.
However, once the energy consumption to maintain order is out of control, the demons in front of the door will eventually collapse.
For a long time now, I feel like I'm a little bit smart, but extremely lazy. In reading, I was surprised that the teacher managed the case, the papers, the study analysis and the schedule in the computer; after working, I was impressed by some old-school engineers who were able to clean up the vast engineering assets and even the parts of the versions. I have often been able to draw a few broad categories, which in the past have always been attributed to my inertia and to my inability to “scatter hours and hours”.
It was only recently re-examined that it became clear that this was a mismatch between cognitive structures. They can do this because the chain of thinking naturally corresponds to the hierarchy code of the tree catalogue, and my thinking is jumping and spreading, and what emerges in my mind is a web of interwoven high-dimensional features that cannot be absorbed into an absolute one-way stretch.
The danger of this cognitive load has recently erupted on several of my computers.
I wrote a script full of scans, and the result was suffocating: one of the devices alone, the scattered Git warehouse was over 200. If it is really going to be “time-scattered”, it is necessary to go to these directories one by one. But for those who leap out of their minds, each warehouse is not a dead folder, but a condensed thinker's slice — just walking between paths, with frequent context switchings causing a storm; any slight change in information or a glitch of power will suddenly create a whole network of thoughts that inspires unstoppable thoughts.
My brain's rated power does not hold up this level of cache windstorms and force them to sort out, and it only exhausts my mind in overwork. And the tools that are common on the market, without exception, are based on the logic of hierarchical indices, which, instead of helping, are pushing me to do more in vain.
Since the problem arises with the fundamental mismatch between the processor structure and the data organization, the solution is by no means a force of will, but rather a recasting of the bottom interactive agreement.
I stopped using the futility of "relationful" and dissected my own cognitive model: My brain is essentially a high-dimensional, networked feature matching system that naturally excludes the serial location of tree-shaped structures. Based on the excavation of these pain spots, I have reformulated a set of management tools for characteristic-sensitive thinking: the creation of the “context firewall” to stop unnecessary mental provocations by replacing the hierarchy path with a feature multi-dimensional projection. It is no longer a rush monitor, but rather an external co-processing agent that shares the cost of doing work for the doorman.
Readers, this article was created by the birth of this little tool, but if it is only about code and engineering, it falls short of the purpose of this intellectual examination. In this section, I would like to discuss with you a few deeper questions:
- The end of the morning: are the “packing” that we're obsessed with every day, whether it's dusting or covering our minds?
- Thinking and panorama: can this deconstructive formula for leapfrogging thinking be extended to document, knowledge and even universal asset governance?
- The knowledge and empowerment of the AI age: what are the core prerequisites for building an individual order at a time when the technological threshold is gradually falling?
Wings: from moral self-examination to cognitive confirmation
To be sure, when most people in the world face disorder, the first reaction is often a moral judgment.
In the traditional educational and workplace contexts, table-cleaning, document-writing systems are regarded as symbols of self-discipline and maturity, while incoherence and vague classification are often labelled as “lazy”, “funct”, “unstructured”. For a long time, I've been a prisoner of this kind. Every time you look at your tumultuous hard drive, there's an incoherent internal consumption — blame yourself for not being able to “time and time” and blame yourself for not being able to defeat entropy.
However, the first lesson I have learned from this review is that the first step of “scrambling” is not to wipe something out, but to wipe your mind.
The dust of so-called thoughts is precisely the belief that “the standards that others can do, I must adapt to them”.
When I really stopped to dissect myself with an objective, cold engineering perspective, I found that jumping thinking was not a physical defect, but a different calculation structure:
- Its advantages lie in cross-cutting intuitiveness, instant extraction of high-dimensional characteristics, and the emergence of inspiration from the sky;
- Its physical cost is a very high level of psychological resistance to forced classification and collusion.
If you're a neurocalculator that is naturally suitable for running the map database (Graph Database) or vector search, and you have to force the traditional B+ tree one-way index through willpower, then every time you search for a file, it triggers a large-scale internal anomaly to replace cache.
The author presses that, in my personal experience, the “delayed” and “lazy” that used to blame myself is often a self-insurance mechanism for mental systems in the face of severe cognitive resistance. The first step in identifying real needs is to wipe out the dust of moral self-responsible and identify the board of perceptions.
Chetes and builders: smooth construction and space leaps
Once you know your own cognitive model, the solution goes to the canal. Now that I'm not fit to go through the physical catalogues, why make myself like a librarian to catalogue them?
I have conceived and achieved the local platform giit. In designing the tool, I did not employ the discipline logic of “how to teach users how to regulate” in any market, but focused entirely on the quality of jump-starting thinking, breaking it down into a smooth transition and a full life cycle of space operations:
Phase 1: Smooth creation of space from a physical directory
Many tools are difficult to implement because, in the first step, they require users to “remov” - Prior to access, it would take a few days to reorganize and catalogue all inventories. This would be tantamount to the interruption of a storm on the starting line for those who leap out of their minds.
Thus, the first phase of the giit seeks a smooth, zero-resistant start:
- Unsensual detection and overall indexing: direct automatic detection of the computer HF code catalogue without destroying the original disk tree structure;
- Water-to-water bridge, identified by hand: routine disks, such as cd work, are still used on a daily basis, but the verbs group or tag are struck on the spot in a warehouse. (a) Use the numbering menu in case of absence, so that business attribution or labelling can be completed by a numerical light;
- The noise catalogue is shielded: encounters a complex of old directories or third-party libraries, a line hite or fold, which folds directly into the overall scanning and view.
There is no need to draw the energy of adjustment blocks for a “mass-and-smuggle” to change the bones, and dynamic space is created by nature in every passing “light” of everyday life.
Phase II: Flow-to-place actions in dynamic space
When the business group (Group, \) and the attribute label (Tag, \ (M\)) evolves as the day flows, the tool naturally moves into the second phase:
- Alternative tier paths in multidimensional terms: on the physical disk, the code is scattered everywhere; but in cognitive vision, through a set of free Tags and Group, the total assets are brought together at once in line with current thinking. If you want to look at core business, you want to look at core business, and if you want to look for a prototype of a particular attribute, you come together through a label funnel.
- Space, context, verb intended:
All follow-up actions are defaulted upon entry into a single warehouse point. There is no longer a requirement to knock repeatedly on long paths or to remember the cumbersome parameters of command line. If you want to submit it, knock on the tig if you want to see the changes; if you want to enter, you have the option to cross and softly take it, never throw out a cold grammatical error.
- context Firewall Interruption: Objective Git submission and branching are the bottom facts, while the subjective governance conclusions of the developers are permanently sunk. Stores that exist physically but are folded or hidden will never jump out and provoke meaningless hysteria.
Extended value: from passive retrieval to active “directional thinking”
After a steady operation in this space, I felt an unexpected gain: It not only passively embraces my leaping thinking, but in turn becomes a scaffold of thinking that I have taken the initiative to guide.
When people are extremely focused or busy, they tend to fall into a single-path tunnel view; when they are free and want to start a new thinking, they often face empty screens that do not know where to get in.
At this point, I can pull the relevant project slices under a particular Tag. Look at these same nodes that have been explored over time and try to induce themselves:
- “Do I have any unresolved questions in this category that deserve to be further explored?”
- "Can these homogenous, but evolving, modules reflect on a common model?"
It evolved from the original simple "storage indexer" to an external echobox that kept me thinking break points and activated thinking when needed.
Think twice: The essence of asset management is "cognitive mapping."
The machine came to an end and I began to look at a broader proposition:
This deconstructive formula for jump-through thinking only applies to Git code warehouse? Are daily document management, knowledge notes, and even more general personal digital assets equally suffering from a hierarchy?
The answer is clearly yes.
Readers would like to take a look at their daily life: for example, you received a commercial cooperation agreement with a confidentiality clause in your instant messaging software:
- It's part of 2026 work/legal compliance/agreements/?
- or belongs to a client project/business attachment/?
- Or are they part of/financial audit/pending process/?
For example, you downloaded a classic paper from the browser about the distribution system consistency protocol:
- It's the deposit/technical research/distribution system/consensus algorithm/?
- Or is it in / learning materials/system architecture/classic thesis/?
- Or are they on file/current research and development projects/references/?
The tree catalogue inherited by a single parent compels a person to be given a single “life-long place” at the moment the information is born. But in reality, the attributes of information are always multidimensional. It is precisely because the brain is forced to preduce the search path of the future at a time when the decision-making “place of belonging” is afraid to organize the document.
It seems to me that the future of broad-based asset management is bound to follow the path of this philosophy:
- Marginalization of storage physical position (Storage Decoupling): The physical path is no longer important regardless of the directory or even the device in which the document is located.
- Dynamic view and semantic projection: the user defines filter conditions in real time based on current intent (project, phase, status, associated person) and documents are dynamically aggregated on the view layer.
- In-situ Consumption: Consumption and governance take place at the same time, marking the dimensions between the browsing and reading hands, and refusing to devote a great deal of energy to “sweeping”.
The leap from “physical packagings” to “cognitive intent projection” is not lazy, but rather a paradigm of information management, which goes back to connecting the human mind to the flow of ideas from the compact disk of the fit machine.
AI Age Rethinking: the threshold of self-awareness, nature insight and construction
It's written here that we can't get around this dramatic change in technology.
Five years ago, it was extremely costly for a person with a unique cognitive habit to create a platform that fully fits his entire assets: you need to know the bottom of the system, API, know the end interaction, handle interplatform compatibility and performance. For the non-programmers group, this is no less than a matter of night and night, and most people have to be comfortable with the available software available on the market.
However, in the current rapid evolution of AI, the threshold for achieving technology is being progressively lowered. A person who does not have a deep engineering background, provided that he/she is able to articulate his/her problems, can use a large-language model as a tool for meeting specific needs.
However, the lowering of the threshold for the manufacture of tools does not automatically amount to a release of mind.
There are extremely stringent prerequisites for achieving a tool that truly fits itself. This premise is not what Prompt should write, but:
- Will it be possible, in a long process of external noise and judgment, to see the truest of its cognitive qualities, its boundaries and its rigid needs?
- Is there an abstract ability to penetrate images and identify the underlying issues (e.g. mathematical mechanics, informatics patterns, data structure and algorithmic nature)?
- Are there the courage to jump out of the established secular paradigm of tools to define for themselves an interactive set of compatible models and life orders?
In the AI era, the preparation of functional units and templates with clear, well-designed and standardized specifications of borders is rapidly degrading into mechanical manual labour; however, in the absence of a clear framework definition and boundary demarcation, the development of complex systems is still an unreachable dream.
To put it further, if there is a lack of ability to see the essence through the appearances, even when hands are held on AI, people tend to turn to the surface and create yet another mediocre toy; and if there is no loss of heart, it is just another slightly more complex “level catalog monitor” who continues to whip himself mentally with mass industrialization standards.
This is an interesting aspect of AI: it drastically reduces the resistance from the concept to the object, allowing people to break the cage of ready-made software and translate their unique cognitive paradigm into reality.
Concluding remarks: "All people have the virtue of dragons."
I'm going to go back to the beginning of the show and see what happens.
We have come to understand that the so-called “hours and hours at a time” have never been to suffer in vain in order to meet the standards of secular cleansing, but rather to look after their minds and emotions with a sober mind and to fade away from prejudices and internal consumption that are attached to the cognitive surface.
They know themselves first, and then they know what they are, and through the essence of things they can be modified by a device.
In Confucius, there is a vast view of the universe and a humanistic concern — the expression of “Little Dragons, Gees” — that aspires to the weather of the heavens and the earth** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * It is not for the people of the whole world to wear down their personalities and fight for the top of the same mountain, but for everyone to be able to see, to stand up for himself, and to stretch their natural potential to the extreme; and for everyone to be strong by his own discipline, to stand alone and not be tamed by any single standard.
Times are handing over technologies to lower the threshold to everyone. You do not have to become a slave to any available tool, nor do you have to force your own leaping inspiration to move on to any rigid hierarchy, or to a well-established, secular mindset.
And remove from your hearts the dust, and establish the true self, and establish for yourself an order in the conduct of the mind. On this journey, every man has his light and every man is a dragon.
Correlation: push down cages - design capability / plethora (vi)
Auto-fetched and translated by AI Atlas. All rights belong to the original author.