Amazon创始人杰夫·贝佐斯(Jeff Bezos)和演员杰森·斯塔特姆(Jason Statham)在共同之处有着鲜明的特征：他们都是著名的秃头，然而，有一些画面显示两人在X、Threads和Bluesky周围流通，两人的头发比通常剃光的外观要多很多，在Bezos的案例中，这似乎是非常新鲜的移植。 都只是照片编辑假冒
不要被这些著名秃头的假发愚弄
在容易的AI假冒的时代，编辑的Jeff Bezos的狗仔队照片提醒人们，并非一切都是看上去的样子。
Verge团队的少数成员在社交媒体的资讯中遇到这些文章，部分分享者声称(或似乎被愚弄为相信)贝佐斯和斯塔特姆接受了头发移植手术。 由於AI在社交媒体上贴上标签的解决方案普遍吸食此假象，很容易被误导，社会媒体的推特可以把参与变成收入流
我们不知道是否使用人工智能工具，来编辑Bezos和Statham，我们无法完全确定他们何时才被张贴
我透过Google的反向图像搜索工具，对于Bezos debunk，我发现他的照片在相似的背景环境中，寻找功劳之后，我找到了他们未改变状态的原始照片，照片于2023年拍摄。 寻找Statham的原始无色图像更为容易——反向图像搜索立即浮出水面标注的原作版本，2011年被一只狗仔破解。
如果你知道要找什么，主要旗帜是Bezos和Statham可能不可能成为现实的换发手术候选人，你从技术上来讲可以从其他地方(甚至其他人)拿来，但由于不良的结果和对拒绝的关注，这样做是极其罕见的。 移植病人也通常会在第一周左右经历一些相当戏剧性的面部肿胀，而Bezos 显示对此没有迹象。 Wigs, toupes，以及其他发型系统也可以用作非永久的发型修复解决方案，但作为曾经做和安装这些发型专业的人，对于像Bezos这样富有和连接的人来说，这将是一个令人惊叹的呼喊，去走这条路线，最终还是看起来像一个Chia Pet.
这并非第一次在社交媒体上愚弄人，之前的事件给了我们一个病毒喷射的教宗，最近的趋势是，卡伦·特纳、哈里·斯泰尔斯和诺亚·施纳普等名人的照片被操纵去脱他们的衬衫。 这些编辑一般都是为了打乱那些被愚弄或根本不在乎核实事实的人
若你不确定是否有名人面孔的假象，请记住大多数令人信服的编辑(AI或其他)都是基于真实的照片
本文由 AI图鉴自动抓取并翻译，版权归原作者所有；如需查看原文请点下方链接。
Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and actor Jason Statham have a distinctive feature in common: They’re both famously bald, and that definitely hasn’t changed in the last few days. However, there are some images of the two men circulating around X, Threads, and Bluesky in which they both have substantially more hair than their usual shaved look, which in Bezos’ case appears to be very freshly transplanted. It’s all just photo editing fakery, AI or otherwise.
Don’t be fooled by the fake hair on these famous baldies
In the era of easy AI fakery, edited paparazzi photos of Jeff Bezos are a reminder that not everything is what it seems.
It’s unclear how viral these posts are, but they’re prevalent enough that a few members of the Verge team have encountered them in their social media feeds. Some people who shared them claimed (or were seemingly fooled into believing) that Bezos and Statham had undergone hair transplant surgery. Generative AI tools have made this kind of photo manipulation or outright creation more accessible and convincing, and because AI labeling solutions on social media broadly suck at flagging this fakery, it’s easy to be misled unless you’re wary of everything you see online. In a world where social media shitposters can turn engagement into a revenue stream, they’re not going to stop churning out attention-grabbing fabricated nonsense anytime soon.
We don’t know if AI tools were used to make the follicled Bezos and Statham edits — none of the images I tested flagged for Content Credentials or SynthID markers. We also can’t fully establish when they were first posted or who made them, but they are definitely fake, and it only took me a couple of minutes to confirm it.
In both cases, I ran the photos through Google’s reverse image search tool. For the Bezos debunk, I found photographs of him in a similar background environment and wearing the exact same outfit (with, yes, no hair) that included a watermarked image credit at the bottom left. Searching for the credit then led me to the original photographs in their unaltered state, which were taken in 2023. Finding the original tressless images of Statham was even easier — the reverse image search immediately surfaced watermarked versions of the originals, which were snapped by a paparazzo in 2011.
There’s other evidence too if you know what to look for. The main flag is that it’s probably impossible for Bezos and Statham to be realistic candidates for hair replacement surgery anyway; it requires you to have enough “donor” hair to sacrifice from the back and sides of your head to then replant closer to your desired hairline. You can technically take it from other places (or even other people), but doing so is incredibly rare due to undesirable results and rejection concerns. Transplant patients also typically experience some pretty dramatic facial swelling for the first week or so, which Bezos shows no signs of. Wigs, toupees, and other hair systems can also be used as nonpermanent hair restoration solutions, but as someone who used to make and install them professionally, it would be an astounding whoopsie for someone as rich and connected as Bezos to go this route and still end up looking like a Chia Pet.
This isn’t the first time photo-manipulated fakery has fooled people across social media, and with ongoing generative AI advancements, it probably won’t be the last. Previous incidents gave us the viral swagged-out pope, and recent trends have seen paparazzi photographs of celebrities like Callum Turner, Harry Styles, and Noah Schnapp being manipulated to remove their shirts. These kinds of edits are typically designed to rack up likes, reposts, and other engagement — they play into our fascination with celebrities’ lives with fabricated situations that are just outlandish enough to be believable, grab our attention, and be shared around as the latest hot gossip by those who are fooled, or who simply don’t care to verify the facts.
If you’re ever unsure if there’s fakery afoot with images of famous faces, just remember that most of the convincing edits (AI or otherwise) are based on real photos that you can hunt down to verify the original source.
Auto-fetched and translated by AI Atlas. All rights belong to the original author.