《纽约时报》和一些其他出版物对该公司提起诉讼，因为据路透社报道，该公司让勇者网浏览器涉嫌非法刮去培训AI，还让用户绕过他们的付费墙。
纽约时报起诉勇者网浏览器AI刮和绕过付费墙
据称勇者组织向许多AI公司提供了 " 扭曲的版权内容 "。
根据经营纽约日报、芝加哥论坛报和奥兰多哨兵公司的投诉，勇者软件公司通过向AI公司提供“勇者指数的实时在线内容”的付费访问，将其被拆散的网站指数货币化。 AI公司然后使用该指数来培训其模型，访问“响应特定用户查询”的内容，或两者兼而有之。 据称，Brave向包括Anthropic、Perplexity、Mistral、xAI和Cohere在内的许多AI公司提供了“扭曲的版权内容”。
勇敢者还提倡通过浏览器中的“Paywall屏蔽器”功能来获取“数百个顶级出版商”。
“Brave从未要求出版商允许他们访问自己的网站，更没有要求他们复制材料并提供给用户或其他AI公司”。 " 相反，如上所述，勇者号允许其用户绕过出版商的付费墙，而无需
并采取了其他措施阻止出版商进入出版商的网站。 勇敢者从未补偿出版商非法使用、复制和分发出版商版权内容的行为。
“虽然我们相信以道德和负责任的方式使用和发展AI，但勇敢地无视既定的版权法，无视《泰晤士报》一再提出的停止其侵犯行为的要求，” “我们提出这一诉讼是为了让勇敢者对偷窃我们的内容负责，以便为自己的产品提供动力，并将其提供给世界上一些最知名和资源最充足的AI公司。”
勇敢，Anthropic,Mistral,SpaceXSI，以及Cohere，都没有立即回复征求意见的请求。 “《纽约时报》给律师的薪酬过高，给记者的薪酬不足。 (谁能轻易查明这件诉讼案中的假象。 ) 杰西·德怀尔(Jesse Dwyer),Perplexity的首席通信官，称在给The Verge的声明中。
本文由 AI图鉴自动抓取并翻译，版权归原作者所有；如需查看原文请点下方链接。
The New York Times and a group of other publications have filed lawsuits against the company that makes the Brave web browser over alleged unlawful scraping to train AI and also letting users bypass their paywalls, as reported by Reuters.
The New York Times sues Brave web browser for AI scraping and bypassing paywalls
Brave has allegedly provided ‘stolen copyrighted content’ to many AI companies.
According to a complaint filed by the companies that run New York Daily News, the Chicago Tribune, and the Orlando Sentinel, Brave Software has monetized its index of scraped websites by, in part, providing AI companies with paid access to “real-time online content from the Brave Index.” The AI companies then use that index to train their models, access content to “respond to specific user queries,” or both. Brave has allegedly provided “stolen copyrighted content” to “many” AI companies including Anthropic, Perplexity, Mistral, xAI, and Cohere.
Brave also promotes “hundreds of top publishers” as being accessible through its “Paywall blocker” feature in its browser.
“Brave has never asked for the Publishers’ permission to access their websites, much less to copy the material and provide it to users or other AI companies,” the complaint says. “On the contrary, as noted above, Brave allows its users to bypass the Publishers’ paywalls without
their consent, and has taken other steps that prevent the Publishers from blocking Brave’s access to the Publishers’ websites. Brave has never compensated the Publishers for the unlawful use, copying, and distribution of the Publishers’ copyrighted content.”
“While we believe in the ethical and responsible use and development of AI, Brave has flouted established copyright law and ignored repeated requests by The Times to stop its infringing conduct,” Graham James, an NYT spokesperson, says in a statement. “We filed this lawsuit to hold Brave accountable for stealing our content to power its own products and to provide it to some of the most prominent and well resourced generative AI companies in the world.”
Brave, Anthropic, Mistral, SpaceXSI, and Cohere, didn’t immediately reply to a request for comment. “The New York Times is overpaying its attorneys and underpaying its journalists. (Who could’ve easily identified the disinformation in this suit.)” Jesse Dwyer, Perplexity’s chief communications officer, says in a statement to The Verge.
Auto-fetched and translated by AI Atlas. All rights belong to the original author.