Google DeepMind拥有推出 Gemini 4 Carbon，是其迄今为止最强的模型。 Gemini 4 Carbon是来自Google的前沿模型，用于长视域代理编码和网络安全防御。 它在更新的v5.0人工分析智能指数上排名第1位，得分59. 对于开发者来说，捕获就是访问。 Carbon从一个经过审查的网络维权团体开始，而不是公众API.
TL；数据
- 大小：未披露参数计数和上下文窗口。 其前身Gemini 4 Argon有1,048,576个托肯语境。
- 仅Google主持。 无开放权重，无自宿，无量化变种。
- 性能：17项中第15项已公布的基准测试对Argon,GPT-6 Astra,Opus 5.5和Fable 5.1.
- 最佳：在GraphWalks(256K至1M令牌)上为96.2%的BFS F1，而Argon为84.2%。
- 最差：OSWorld-2.1上的81.5%，以87.2%的成绩落后于Claude Opus 5.5.
- 底线：最佳：最先进弱点发现、开发和补丁。 最糟糕的是，你可能还不能叫它。
Gemini 4 Carbon是什么东西？
碳是第二个Gemini 4型号，沿用Gemini 4 Argon. Google团队表示，模型的目标是艰苦，长期运行的工程工作。 内部团队看到Carbon在单项任务上跑了好几天。 例子包括横跨大型密码库和低层系统的根诱发和补丁微妙的bug.
Google还调制了Carbon，用于全网开发和多式联运理解。 在WebDev Arena上，Carbon在1769年获得了89个埃洛点数，达到#4.
Gemini 4碳在基准测试上的表现如何？.
Google在其发布的帖子中公布了17行的比较。 碳在最高的思维环境运行。 按Google的评价方法，大多数竞争者的数字由各供应商自行报告。
代理编码：碳在终端-Bench 4.0(AA)上得分65.2%，以59.6%的成绩领先Opus 5.5. 它在SWE-sweep上是达到 9.6%，以9.5%的比GPT-6 Astra小得多。 GPT-6 Astra领先65.5%
计算机使用和知识工作：在Agents ' Last Exam v1.1上，碳达到77.4%. 在Vending-Bench 2上，它以16,484美元的银行余额结束，这是上市最高的。
长背景与科学：GraphWalks差距最大：GPT-6 Astra的比分为96.2%对71.8%. Carbon在Riemann Bench上也贴出了80.0%.
为什么碳与网络安全相关？
Google框架碳环绕整个防御生命周期：找到，验证，然后固定。 网易基准测试评价时没有护栏。
- 调查结果：88.2%的SEC-bench Pro，而85.4%的GPT-6 Astra。
- 剥削：54.8%在剥削基姆，42.4%在GPT-6 Astra,34.5%在Opus 5.5。
- 补丁：在Collinear的CWE-bench上占71.0%，在Argon和GPT-6 Astra上占68.0%。
Google利用它的反重力控制装置，计算了SEC-bench Pro和ExputitGym本身的得分。 利用Gym跑来减肥在内部，Carbon在生成安全代码方面表现出超过2x的成功率，超过了Argon. Google团队表示，Chrome团队在高质量补丁中发现碳超过10x比另一个实验室的模型更好。 Wiz报告Carbon领导其网络渗透测试基准测试。
和Carbon有什么安全改变？
碳保持Argon的分层堆积：训练、实时滥用防御、快速注射复原力和思维链监测。 Google报告了若干调整收益：
- 在Bench4.0终端成功作弊率降至0.00%，作弊未遂率为0.4%。
——现场内部编码中的高度错位警报下降近80%.
- 不支持的声称大约2x对阿尔贡。
- 超覆盖率下降26%，服务不足率下降29%。
- 从Argon的0.7%下降到0.0 %。
这些是Google的内部或自营人物。 尚未可以独立复制。
开发者如何访问Gemini 4 Carbon?.
还没有，对大多数来说。 Google正在参与美国政府的自愿释放前测试程序。 本周，一部分网络维权者可以访问。 更受信任的伙伴通过Fairwind方案，该方案优先考虑政府、关键基础设施运营商和核心技术平台。 开发者，企业和消费者后来获得碳，没有给出日期。
定价符合Argon的引入率：每百万美元输入令牌2美元，每百万产出令牌10美元。 缓存输入值为 95%。 在开始阶段之后，价格上升到4美元和20美元。
Gemini 4 碳对竞争对手
基准测试行：Google 发布帖；对手分数大多是按方法自报。
关键外卖
- Gemini 4 碳在人工分析指数v5.0在59.
- 领导SEC-bench Pro(88.2%)、ExpotitGym(54.8%)和CWE-bench(71.0%)。
- GraphWalks 上下文长达到 96.2%，最宽的边距。
- Claude Opus 5.5仍然赢得OSWorld-2.1;GPT-6 Astra赢得FrontielSWE.
- 从网络维权者开始，每百万信使2美元/10美元。
请检查access-date=中的日期值 (帮助) Google的发布帖子，评价方法和Fairwind Program页面。 并加入我们的通讯。 等等你在电报里吗现在你也可以加入我们的电报。
需要和我们合作推广您的 GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar 等吗？联系我们
Asif Razzaq是Marktechpost AI Media Inc.的首席执行官。 作为一个有远见的企业家和工程师，阿西夫致力于利用人工智能的潜力促进社会福祉。 他最近的努力是人工智能媒体平台的发布，该平台以深入报道机器学习和深层学习新闻而著称，这些新闻在技术上既可靠又为广大观众所容易理解。 该平台每月有超过200万次观看，表明其受观众欢迎。
本文由 AI图鉴自动抓取并翻译，版权归原作者所有；如需查看原文请点下方链接。
Google DeepMind has introduced Gemini 4 Carbon, its strongest model to date. Gemini 4 Carbon is a frontier model from Google built for long-horizon agentic coding and cybersecurity defense. It ranks #1 on the updated v5.0 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with a score of 59. For developers, the catch is access. Carbon starts with a vetted group of cyber defenders, not the public API.
TL;DR
- Size: Parameter count and context window not disclosed. Its predecessor, Gemini 4 Argon, has a 1,048,576-token context.
- Runs on: Google-hosted only. No open weights, no self-hosting, no quantized variants.
- Performance: Leads 15 of 17 published benchmarks versus Argon, GPT-6 Astra, Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1.
- Best: 96.2% BFS F1 on GraphWalks (256K to 1M tokens), versus 84.2% for Argon.
- Worst: 81.5% on OSWorld-2.1, trailing Claude Opus 5.5 at 87.2%.
- Bottom line: Best: state-of-the-art vulnerability finding, exploitation and patching. Worst: you probably cannot call it yet.
What is Gemini 4 Carbon?
Carbon is the second Gemini 4 model, following Gemini 4 Argon. Google team states that the model targets hard, long-running engineering work. Internal teams saw Carbon run for days on single tasks. Examples include root-causing and patching subtle bugs across large codebases and low-level systems.
Google also tuned Carbon for full-stack web development and multimodal understanding. On WebDev Arena, Carbon gained 89 Elo points to reach #4 at 1769.
How does Gemini 4 Carbon perform on benchmarks?
Google published a 17-row comparison in its launch post. Carbon was run at the highest thinking setting. Most rival numbers are self-reported by each provider, per Google’s evaluation methodology.
Agentic coding: Carbon scores 65.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 (AA), ahead of Opus 5.5 at 59.6%. It hits 9.6% on SWE-sweep, narrowly ahead of GPT-6 Astra at 9.5%. On FrontierSWE, GPT-6 Astra leads at 65.5% versus Carbon’s 61.2%.
Computer use and knowledge work: Carbon reaches 77.4% on Agents’ Last Exam v1.1. On Vending-Bench 2, it ends with a $16,484 bank balance, the highest listed.
Long context and science: GraphWalks is the widest gap: 96.2% versus 71.8% for GPT-6 Astra. Carbon also posts 80.0% on RiemannBench.
Why does Carbon relevant for cybersecurity?
Google frames Carbon around the full defense lifecycle: find, validate, then fix. Cyber benchmarks were evaluated without guardrails.
- Finding: 88.2% on SEC-bench Pro, versus 85.4% for GPT-6 Astra.
- Exploiting: 54.8% on ExploitGym, versus 42.4% for GPT-6 Astra and 34.5% for Opus 5.5.
- Patching: 71.0% on Collinear’s CWE-bench, versus 68.0% for Argon and GPT-6 Astra.
Google computed SEC-bench Pro and ExploitGym scores itself, using its Antigravity harness. ExploitGym ran with mitigations off. Internally, Carbon showed more than 2x higher success at generating secure code than Argon. Google team states that the Chrome team found Carbon over 10x better than another lab’s model at high-quality patches. Wiz reports Carbon leading its web penetration testing benchmarks.
What safety changes ship with Carbon?
Carbon keeps Argon’s layered stack: training, real-time misuse defenses, prompt-injection resilience and chain-of-thought monitoring. Google reports several alignment gains:
- Successful cheating on Terminal-Bench 4.0 fell to 0.0%, with cheating attempts at 0.4%.
- High-severity misalignment alerts in live internal coding dropped by almost 80%.
- Unsupported claims fell roughly 2x versus Argon.
- Overreach fell 26% and under-service fell 29%.
- Attack success on Gray Swan’s Indirect Prompt Injection benchmark is 0.0%, down from Argon’s 0.7%.
These are Google’s internal or self-run figures. Independent replication is not yet available.
How can developers access Gemini 4 Carbon?
Not yet, for most. Google is participating in the U.S. government’s voluntary pre-release testing process. This week, a subset of cyber defenders gets access. More trusted partners follow through the Fairwind Program, which prioritizes governments, critical infrastructure operators and core tech platforms. Developers, businesses and consumers get Carbon later, with no date given.
Pricing matches Argon’s introductory rate: $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens. Cached input is 95% off. After the introductory period, prices rise to $4 and $20.
Gemini 4 Carbon vs competitors
Benchmark rows: Google launch post; rival scores mostly self-reported per methodology.
Key Takeaways
- Gemini 4 Carbon ranks #1 on Artificial Analysis Index v5.0 at 59.
- It leads SEC-bench Pro (88.2%), ExploitGym (54.8%) and CWE-bench (71.0%).
- GraphWalks long context hits 96.2%, its widest margin.
- Claude Opus 5.5 still wins OSWorld-2.1; GPT-6 Astra wins FrontierSWE.
- Access starts with cyber defenders at $2/$10 per million tokens.
Check out the Google’s launch post, the evaluation methodology and the Fairwind Program page. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Wait! are you on telegram? now you can join us on telegram as well.
Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.? Connect with us
Asif Razzaq is the CEO of Marktechpost AI Media Inc.. As a visionary entrepreneur and engineer, Asif is committed to harnessing the potential of Artificial Intelligence for social good. His most recent endeavor is the launch of an Artificial Intelligence Media Platform, Marktechpost, which stands out for its in-depth coverage of machine learning and deep learning news that is both technically sound and easily understandable by a wide audience. The platform boasts of over 2 million monthly views, illustrating its popularity among audiences.
Auto-fetched and translated by AI Atlas. All rights belong to the original author.