2026年10月28日 (英语).
Gemini 4 Carbon 是人工分析智能指数v5上的新1号
见模型页面
Google的Gemini 4 Carbon是人工分析智能指数v5上的新1，在人工分析编码Agent指数上仅次于Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 4 Carbon在Intelligence Index v5上得分59分，由在复杂推理，知识和科学任务中的领先表现所驱动。 它在编码和知识工作方面也有很大收益，特别是与其他Gemini模型相比，但它并没有在所有这些领域领先。
和Gemini 4 Argon的发布一样，Gemini 4 Carbon正在向选定的用户推出，尚未公开。 Google提供50%的发布折扣，没有确认结束日期。 所有图表和数字都使用Gemini 4碳和Argon的标准定价。
Gemini 4 Carbon 具有高推理性的关键结果：
Gemini 4 Carbon领先情报指数v5，在9个指数评价中的4个中得分为#1:HLE-Diamond,Terminal-Bench-Science,AA-Omniscience，自动化Bench-AA. 碳在其他地方取得巨大收益，但在编码和知识工作方面并不领先
仅后面的Claude Opus 5.5在编码agents：使用Antigravity CLI,Gemini 4 Carbon(高)在人工分析编码Agent指数上仅比Claude Code得分59分3分，与Claude Opus 5.5(最大，62分). 碳在终端-Bench 4.0(64%)和FrontierCode v1.1(51%)中位居第二，落后于Claude Opus 5.5(最大)56%. Google在这方面历来表现不佳，因此这一改进突出。
改善的代理知识工作，但还没有领先：在AA-Briefcase上，Gemini 4 Carbon(高)得分1609 Elo，比Gemini 4 Argon(高，1483)提高126分，但仍落后于模型，包括Grok 4.7(高，1638),Muse Wonder(最大，1659)和Kimi K3.1 Pro(1678). 最大的收益来自演示文稿，293 Elo上升到1598年，同时分析质量提高到1671年120分。
相对整体情报而言，每个任务的成本低于Claude Opus 5.5：按照标准定价，Gemini 4 Carbon每个情报指数任务的成本为7.76美元，比Claude Opus 5.5(最大，10.04美元)低23%，但~1.2x GPT-6 Astra(最大，6.25美元). 它每任务使用123k输出符，比Claude Opus 5.5(最大，173k)少29%. 按4美元/20美元的标准定价，每个任务的成本与Gemini 4 Argon(7.68美元)一致，同时在情报指数上得分更高9分
领先AA-Omniscience v1.1分，低幻觉：Gemini 4 Carbon 在最近更新的AA-Omniscience v1.1中得分54分，比Claude Opus 5.5(最大48分)领先6分，比Gemini 4 Argon(46分)领先8分。 准确性(%正确)比阿尔贡高10分，达到58%，而它的幻觉率则从4%上升到11%. 这仍然是任何型号中第二低的，仅落后于Argon，而Claude Opus 5.5(最大)和GPT-6 Astra(最大)均为50%.
关键模型细节：
上下文窗口：1M 令牌
多种模式：文本、图像、视频和语音输入，以及文本输出
定价：每1M输入/输出信物4元/20元，与Gemini 4 Argon标准定价相同，折扣50%. 缓存输入令牌获得95%的折扣(按标准定价，每1M美元0.20美元)
读最新
GitHub Copilot 组合管弦乐器 Anthropic和OpenAI型号平衡性能和成本
它Hub在GitHub Copilot中拥有发布 Copilot Fusion，它协调Anthropic和OpenAI模型。 它以编码Agent指数中每个任务成本的一半在Claude Code的Opus 5.5以下得分。
2026年10月28日 (英语).
人工分析情报索引 v5
Index v5具有2个新的基准测试和3个升级功能。 指数的绝大部分首次建立在私人数据集上
2026年10月27日 (英语).
代码2Video-AA:AI模型如何在代码中设计视频？.
人工分析公司实施HeyGen的Code2Video Bench，评价模型利用HyperFrames HTML从114设计简报中创建短产品和品牌视频的精良程度。
2026年10月26日 (英语).
本文由 AI图鉴自动抓取并翻译，版权归原作者所有；如需查看原文请点下方链接。
October 28, 2026
Gemini 4 Carbon is the new #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5
See model page
Google’s Gemini 4 Carbon is the new #1 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5, and second only to Claude Opus 5.5 on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index
Gemini 4 Carbon scores 59 on Intelligence Index v5, driven by leading performance in complex reasoning, knowledge, and scientific tasks. It also has large gains in coding and knowledge work, particularly when compared to other Gemini models, but it is not leading in all these areas.
As with launch of Gemini 4 Argon, Gemini 4 Carbon is being rolled out to selected users and is not yet publicly available. Google is offering a 50% launch discount, with no confirmed end date. All our charts and figures use standard pricing for both Gemini 4 Carbon and Argon.
Key results for Gemini 4 Carbon with high reasoning:
➤ Gemini 4 Carbon leads the Intelligence Index v5, with the #1 score in 4 of the 9 Index evaluations: HLE-Diamond, Terminal-Bench-Science, AA-Omniscience, AutomationBench-AA. Carbon makes substantial gains elsewhere but is not leading in coding and knowledge work
➤ Behind only Claude Opus 5.5 on coding agents: With Antigravity CLI, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) scores 59 only 3 points behind Claude Code with Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 62) on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index. Carbon ranks second on both Terminal-Bench 4.0 (64%) and FrontierCode v1.1 (51%), behind Claude Opus 5.5 (max) at 56%. Google has historically underperformed in this area and so this improvement stands out.
➤ Improved agentic knowledge work, but not yet leading: On AA-Briefcase, Gemini 4 Carbon (high) scores 1609 Elo, a 126-point improvement over Gemini 4 Argon (high, 1483), but still behind models including Grok 4.7 (xhigh, 1638), Muse Wonder (max, 1659) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (1678). The largest gain comes from Presentation, up 293 Elo to 1598, alongside a 120-point improvement in Analytical Quality to 1671
➤ Lower Cost per Task than Claude Opus 5.5 for comparable overall intelligence: With standard pricing, Gemini 4 Carbon costs $7.76 per Intelligence Index task, ~23% less than Claude Opus 5.5 (max, $10.04) but ~1.2x GPT-6 Astra (max, $6.25). It uses 123k output tokens per task, 29% fewer than Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 173k). At the same $4/$20 standard pricing, its Cost per Task is in line with Gemini 4 Argon ($7.68), while scoring 9 points higher on the Intelligence Index
➤ Leading AA-Omniscience v1.1 score, with low hallucination: Gemini 4 Carbon scores 54 on our recently updated AA-Omniscience v1.1, 6 points ahead of Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 48) and 8 points ahead of Gemini 4 Argon (46). Accuracy (% correct) rises 10 points over Argon to 58%, while its hallucination rate rises from 4% to 11%. This is still the second lowest of any model, behind only Argon, compared with 50% for both Claude Opus 5.5 (max) and GPT-6 Astra (max)
Key model details:
➤ Context Window: 1M tokens
➤ Multimodality: Text, image, video, and speech input, with text output
➤ Pricing: $4/$20 per 1M input/output tokens, the same as Gemini 4 Argon’s standard pricing, with a 50% discount. Cached input tokens receive a 95% discount ($0.20 per 1M at standard pricing)
Read the latest
GitHub Copilot Fusion orchestrates Anthropic and OpenAI models to balance performance and cost
itHub has released Copilot Fusion in GitHub Copilot, which orchestrates between Anthropic and OpenAI models. It scores 2 points below Opus 5.5 in Claude Code at half the Cost per Task in the Coding Agent Index
October 28, 2026
Announcing Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index v5
Index v5 features 2 new benchmarks and 3 upgrades. For the first time, the majority of the Index is built on private datasets
October 27, 2026
Code2Video-AA: how well do AI models design videos in code?
Artificial Analysis' implementation of HeyGen's Code2Video Bench, evaluating how well models create short product and brand videos from 114 design briefs using HyperFrames HTML.
October 26, 2026
Auto-fetched and translated by AI Atlas. All rights belong to the original author.